{"id":136,"date":"2026-05-07T10:30:10","date_gmt":"2026-05-07T10:30:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/?p=136"},"modified":"2026-05-07T10:30:10","modified_gmt":"2026-05-07T10:30:10","slug":"abortion-access-just-took-another-blow-california-wasnt-spared","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/?p=136","title":{"rendered":"Abortion access just took another blow. California wasn\u2019t spared"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p>In the ancient days of 2022, when the Supreme Court sledgehammered abortion rights with the Dobbs decision, the (Republican) party line was that the issue had returned to where it belonged: the states. <\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/?p=134\">Global forest loss\u00a0fell sharply in 2025 after hitting record high<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Fast forward to 2026 and it would now seem that the antiabortion crowd, faced with the aggressive pro-choice response of states such as California and lethargy on the part of the Trump administration to do more toward implementing a national ban, is no longer satisfied with that outcome. <\/p>\n<p>They are now out to stomp on California, and a handful of other reproductive health sanctuaries, to ensure that what happens inside our borders fits their ideology. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s strategic, it\u2019s targeted,\u201d Mini Timmaraju, president and chief executive of Reproductive Freedom for All, told me. \u201cEven if you\u2019re in a \u2018blue state,\u2019 you\u2019re not safe.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The U.S. Supreme Court will decide next week whether to take up the abortion issue again, in a case that could end medication-only procedures as we know them. <\/p>\n<p>That would force women into a less-safe  regimen with a lower success rate that would almost certainly lead to more complications \u2014 and therefore more controversy. Even in California, which would not be spared by what the court could do, and whose policies are central to the case. <\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s break it down. <\/p>\n<h2>Rogue California<\/h2>\n<p>After the Dobbs decision, 11 states passed near-total bans on abortions. <\/p>\n<p>Six other states put early time limits on the procedures, and others passed bans in the second trimester, leaving women in much of the South and the Great Plains with no access to in-person care for hundreds or even thousands of miles. <\/p>\n<p>In many of those places, those bans include making it illegal to receive abortion-inducing medications in the mail from states such as California. But that\u2019s a hard law to enforce unless you go around opening lady-mail. <\/p>\n<p>In recent years, the number of U.S. abortions arranged through telehealth and mailed medication  has skyrocketed to more than a quarter of all procedures, though the often illegal nature of this route probably means the number is higher but underreported. <\/p>\n<p>To protect the doctors and providers who are prescribing and sending these medications, California and other states have passed numerous laws to make it easier and safer \u2014 from allowing the prescriber to remain anonymous to shield laws that ensure those providers can\u2019t be penalized or extradited to other states for prosecution, though some states are trying. <\/p>\n<p>Earlier this year, Louisiana (a state with a full ban) tried to extradite a California doctor with no luck. Gov. Gavin Newsom gleefully denied that request, promising to \u201cnever be complicit with Trump\u2019s war on women.\u201d<\/p>\n<h2>Rogue Louisiana<\/h2>\n<p>In the Supreme Court case, Louisiana is thinking bigger \u2014 and expressing antiabortionists\u2019 frustration with the Trump administration. The state is suing Trump\u2019s  Food and Drug Administration because it allows mifepristone, one of two medications used in abortions, to be prescribed via telehealth. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cPatients and these states with bans and extreme restrictions have relied on providers in blue states, abortion access states, to really help provide care,\u201d Timmaraju said. \u201cAnd this is a way to stop that.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/?p=132\">California, Arizona and Nevada announce new water-saving plan for dwindling Colorado River<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Antiabortion groups had hoped (and pushed) Trump to simply have the FDA remove its approvals of mifepristone, but Trump ain\u2019t that dumb. Despite all his promises on the campaign trail, the administration would prefer to kick the can instead of the hornet\u2019s nest on this one, especially before the midterms \u2014 since most Americans support abortion rights. So the FDA has said it\u2019s \u201cstudying\u201d mifepristone, which could take awhile. <\/p>\n<p>Louisiana is claiming it had to spend $90,000 in taxpayer money to help two women who sought medical treatment after medication abortions (though it has not said they received the medication in the mail).<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s a real harm, it argues, and gives them standing to sue the FDA to stop mifepristone from being prescribed by telehealth at all, claiming the FDA hasn\u2019t done its due diligence to ensure that\u2019s safe and it makes them really sad that they can\u2019t stop women from ordering it. <\/p>\n<p>The FDA has remained \u201ccompletely silent on this point because the Trump administration doesn\u2019t want to get involved,\u201d said Mary Ziegler, a UC Davis law professor and expert on reproductive law. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s totally one of the signs that the antiabortion movement is in an open rebellion, and is using the federal courts to express that because the political branches have been pretty non-responsive,\u201d she said. <\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court lifted a stay Monday imposed by the 5th Circuit that stopped mifepristone from being tele-prescribed. So it\u2019s available until at least May 11. <\/p>\n<p>After that, who knows. It\u2019s up to a court that has proven it\u2019s no friend to reproductive rights. <\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s an issue with real consequence for Trump. If the court takes the case, the midterms must contend with abortion. If they don\u2019t, the pressure on Trump to do so sometime intensifies. But its also an issue with real consequence for Californians. <\/p>\n<h2>Consequences in California<\/h2>\n<p>In California, there are 22 counties without an abortion clinic, Ziegler points out. In the far north of the state, women without access to telehealth abortions would be little better off than those in Louisiana if mifepristone by mail is stopped. <\/p>\n<p>Instead, women would  probably be forced to use the second medication, misoprostol, alone. This single-drug  regimen has a lower effectiveness rate than the combined drugs, meaning more women will have to seek out secondary care \u2014 often in places where even in-person care is hard to come by. That could lead to more real harm, and therefore more high-profile cases of botched abortions to fuel a further ban on misoprostol. <\/p>\n<p>And then there\u2019s the fact that Newsom won\u2019t be governor for much longer, and it will be up to the next chief executive to protect in-state providers from extradition. The top Republican contender, Steve Hilton, has previously said he would allow Louisiana to grab our California doctor if he were in charge. <\/p>\n<p>Those kinds of threats have a chilling effect, both Ziegler and Timmaraju said. If enough providers are scared of the consequences of providing telehealth \u2014 or any \u2014 abortions, a ban becomes self-imposed. <\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/?p=130\">California braces for uncertainty as last shipment of Persian Gulf oil arrives in Long Beach<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Even in California. <\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court will decide whether to take a case that could severely limit telehealth abortions. Even if the justices don&#8217;t take it up, reproductive healthcare will face more attacks.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":135,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-136","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Abortion access just took another blow. California wasn\u2019t spared - California Relocation Journal<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/?p=136\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Abortion access just took another blow. California wasn\u2019t spared - California Relocation Journal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Supreme Court will decide whether to take a case that could severely limit telehealth abortions. Even if the justices don&#039;t take it up, reproductive healthcare will face more attacks.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/?p=136\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"California Relocation Journal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-05-07T10:30:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/de35e703a1c911d80502aca27543e050-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1707\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/?p=136#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/?p=136\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b85b48ca4c2015dd056e0e9c18912121\"},\"headline\":\"Abortion access just took another blow. California wasn\u2019t spared\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-07T10:30:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/?p=136\"},\"wordCount\":1091,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/?p=136#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/de35e703a1c911d80502aca27543e050-scaled.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Politics\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/?p=136#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/?p=136\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/?p=136\",\"name\":\"Abortion access just took another blow. California wasn\u2019t spared - California Relocation Journal\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/?p=136#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/?p=136#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/de35e703a1c911d80502aca27543e050-scaled.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-07T10:30:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/?p=136#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/?p=136\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/?p=136#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/de35e703a1c911d80502aca27543e050-scaled.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/de35e703a1c911d80502aca27543e050-scaled.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1707,\"caption\":\"FILE - An abortion- rights activist holds a box of mifepristone pills as demonstrators from both anti-abortion and abortion-rights groups rally outside the Supreme Court in Washington, Tuesday, March 26, 2024. (AP Photo\\\/Amanda Andrade-Rhoades,File)\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/?p=136#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Abortion access just took another blow. California wasn\u2019t spared\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"California Relocation Journal\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"California Relocation Journal\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/cj.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/cj.png\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"California Relocation Journal\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b85b48ca4c2015dd056e0e9c18912121\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/california-relocation-journal.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Abortion access just took another blow. California wasn\u2019t spared - California Relocation Journal","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/?p=136","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Abortion access just took another blow. California wasn\u2019t spared - California Relocation Journal","og_description":"The Supreme Court will decide whether to take a case that could severely limit telehealth abortions. Even if the justices don't take it up, reproductive healthcare will face more attacks.","og_url":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/?p=136","og_site_name":"California Relocation Journal","article_published_time":"2026-05-07T10:30:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":1707,"url":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/de35e703a1c911d80502aca27543e050-scaled.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/?p=136#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/?p=136"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b85b48ca4c2015dd056e0e9c18912121"},"headline":"Abortion access just took another blow. California wasn\u2019t spared","datePublished":"2026-05-07T10:30:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/?p=136"},"wordCount":1091,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/?p=136#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/de35e703a1c911d80502aca27543e050-scaled.jpg","articleSection":["Politics"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/?p=136#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/?p=136","url":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/?p=136","name":"Abortion access just took another blow. California wasn\u2019t spared - California Relocation Journal","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/?p=136#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/?p=136#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/de35e703a1c911d80502aca27543e050-scaled.jpg","datePublished":"2026-05-07T10:30:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/?p=136#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/?p=136"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/?p=136#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/de35e703a1c911d80502aca27543e050-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/de35e703a1c911d80502aca27543e050-scaled.jpg","width":2560,"height":1707,"caption":"FILE - An abortion- rights activist holds a box of mifepristone pills as demonstrators from both anti-abortion and abortion-rights groups rally outside the Supreme Court in Washington, Tuesday, March 26, 2024. (AP Photo\/Amanda Andrade-Rhoades,File)"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/?p=136#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Abortion access just took another blow. California wasn\u2019t spared"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/","name":"California Relocation Journal","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/#organization","name":"California Relocation Journal","url":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/cj.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/cj.png","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"California Relocation Journal"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b85b48ca4c2015dd056e0e9c18912121","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com"],"url":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=136"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/135"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=136"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=136"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/california-relocation-journal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=136"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}